Upcoming President Infinity – Version Ericson – 2.1.3

Hi everyone,

This post will keep track of changes to the upcoming version of President Infinity v. Ericson – 2.1.3.

Changes so far (this list will be updated as changes are implemented on this side, these changes will not be available until the version is released):

  • 2016 > Debates > Republicans > Oct. 28th, 2015 > Percentage to qualify 1% -> 2%
  • 2016 > new Republican ordering > Trump, Carson, Fiorina, Rubio, Bush, Cruz, Kasich, Huckabee, Christie, Paul, Jindal, Santorum, Graham
  • 2016 > Primaries > Republicans > updated %s
  • 2016 > Primaries > Democrats > updated %s
  • 2016 > Walker, Perry > ‘on’ -> ‘off’ by default
  • 2016 > Trump > changed color
  • 2016 > start dates > Oct. 15th, 2015 -> Oct. 1st, 2015

 

12 thoughts on “Upcoming President Infinity – Version Ericson – 2.1.3

  1. 2016 > new Republican ordering > Trump, Carson, Fiorina, Rubio, Bush, Cruz, Kasich, Huckabee, Christie, Paul, Jindal, Santorum, Graham.
    2016 > Walker, Perry > ‘on’ -> ‘off’ by default.

  2. I’m working on a feature that will allow for ordering, ‘on’-‘off’, and %s to vary based on starting date. Until that’s implemented, I’ll be updating those to the latest.

  3. @ anthony

    I’m getting an issue with proportional representation. I’m playing in the republican primaries as Lindsey Graham, and in primaries/caucuses that have PR, the delegates awarded aren’t ordering right. In the U.S.V.I. caucus, Kasich was the winner, but he as well as the rest of the top four finishers received no delegates. Meanwhile 5-13th receive one delegate each. The same sort of thing is happening with other PR states/territories. And it seems no matter where he finishes, Chris Christie can’t receive any delegates from proportional delegations.

  4. Scratch that on Chris Christie, he won delegates for finishing 2nd in Wyoming. Numbers for some of the territories are still screwed up though.

  5. For the endorsers, Al Gore’s Momentum should be changed from 0 to 1. That’s what most other endorsers are. He would be at least as important as Bloomberg. The same goes for Dick Cheney. He is currently a 0.

  6. @Aaron
    That sounds reasonable. I never took this into consideration and so my additional endorser suggetion with Mondale and Quayle seemed a bit ridiculous. Mea Culpa!
    But with updating Gore and Cheney, it would perhaps make more sense adding them with a 0 …
    @Anthony
    Love the new order of candidates. Seems very well structured.
    Perhaps you could improve the way to order the candidates in the campaign editor.
    Now you can only move step by step, which I find a bit lengthy. It would be better to move them quicker, I think.

  7. @Robert,

    Thanks for this feedback – sounds like a bug with regions where there are small numbers of delegates and PR. Noted.

Leave a Comment