Congress Infinity next release sneak-peek, Windows only

Here is a sneak-peek of the next release, that adds simulation mode, updates House 2016, fixes bugs, and more. You can download it here.

Note: Windows only at this point. Requires you already have the game installed.

Feedback welcome!

2.4.7 (not released yet)

  • Editor > make new party > now copies source party’s ballot access for all constituencies to new party
  • House 2016 > California-4 > McClintock > 40% -> 60%
  • House 2016 > Reps > Super PAC > American Crossroads -> Congressional Leadership Fund
  • Senate 2016 > Reps > Super PAC > American Crossroads -> Senate Leadership Fund

15 Responses to Congress Infinity next release sneak-peek, Windows only

  1. Jack November 3, 2016 at 2:23 pm #

    You mentioned there was a set on/off all ballots button, where is that exactly?

  2. anthony_270admin November 3, 2016 at 6:36 pm #

    @Jack,

    I don’t believe there is such a button. If creating a new party, on-off ballot is set to the values of the party used to create the new party.

  3. anthony_270admin November 3, 2016 at 6:47 pm #

    Hi everyone,

    Particularly interested in feedback on the House 2016 campaign – did I get anything wrong in the districts you’re familiar with? Any candidates running who seem especially strong or weak? Any %s that aren’t supported by polling?

  4. anthony_270admin November 3, 2016 at 6:48 pm #

    Also people familiar with Lousiana, who are the main contenders in the House seats?

  5. Jack November 3, 2016 at 6:55 pm #

    I thought I had read in the comments of the announcements about all of the updates that there would be one. I must have been mistaken.

  6. anthony_270admin November 3, 2016 at 7:08 pm #

    @Jack,

    It’s on the to-do list.

  7. Arjav Rawal November 3, 2016 at 10:38 pm #

    NY-22 has an indy candidate, Martin Babinec, polling in the 20s to 30s. Plans?

  8. Arjav Rawal November 4, 2016 at 7:16 pm #

    Also, how exactly does Tom McClintock get defeated every single time I run a game?

  9. Chris November 5, 2016 at 11:07 am #

    @anthony,
    When u create a new party it’s actually quite annoying because it only sets to the on-off ballot settings of the party used to create it in the first district. For example if I use the Republican Party as a base for a new party it only turns on ballot in California for CA-1 and I have to manually turn them on in all the other California districts.

  10. anthony_270admin November 5, 2016 at 1:17 pm #

    @Chris,

    Thanks for this! I have verified there is a bug in the code for this. Should be fixed for official release.

  11. anthony_270admin November 5, 2016 at 3:57 pm #

    @Chris,

    Fixed in latest internal.

  12. anthony_270admin November 5, 2016 at 4:01 pm #

    @Arjav,

    Thanks for this. Fixed in latest internal.

    House 2016 > California-4 > McClintock > 40% -> 60%

  13. anthony_270admin November 5, 2016 at 4:04 pm #

    @Arjav re NY-22,

    Because Babinec doesn’t seem to be close at this point ( http://www.pressconnects.com/story/news/local/2016/11/03/new-poll-finds-ny-22-two-person-race/93267438/ ), he will probably be left off. If there are multiple independents that have a significant chance of winning their races, an independent party can be made.

  14. anthony_270admin November 5, 2016 at 4:13 pm #

    House 2016 > Reps > Super PAC > American Crossroads -> Congressional Leadership Fund.

  15. anthony_270admin November 5, 2016 at 4:19 pm #

    Senate 2016 > Reps > Super PAC > American Crossroads -> Senate Leadership Fund.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes